Jun 032012
 

A quick look at Netflix reveals a large variety of documentaries of interest to Witches and Pagans.  They range from scientific features on the solar system to “historical” explorations of famous myths and legends.  Cut to accommodate commercials and still fit into a one-hour time slot, these features tend to blaze over large territories of history and make connections among events that strict academics would blush at.  But we should still pay attention to them because they represent how the outside world sees us and, more importantly, how popular media represents us to the mainstream, which in turn affects how non-Pagans treat us.  We have a stake in how others see us.  For this reason, I’d like to explore the various documentaries of interest to modern Pagans to find how they define us, how they depict us, and how they explain us.

The first one I came across was A&E’s Ancient Mysteries: Witches.  This short documentary takes on a daunting task that even experienced Witches would have trouble with: explaining the development of Witchcraft from the Stone Age, through the Burning Times, and into its modern expression, all the while appeasing historians and modern Pagans, avoiding offending Christians, and entertaining mainstream viewers.  This is a really narrow road to follow, one that does not allow for too many large claims to be made, but, if you take these obstacles into account, it’s a pretty good introduction to Witchcraft.

Not surprisingly, the documentary begins with the ancient goddess-worshipping cultures.  While it tends to conflate the practices of early female “priests” with the modern ceremonial aspects of Wicca, the tone is sympathetic and reasonable.  We are told of how the tribal people of the time lived dependent upon the cycles of nature, and how the magic workers of the time took care of their people.  This nicely sets up the later accusation of midwives and herbalists during the inquisition as well as the modern return to a reverence for nature’s patterns.

The coming of warrior tribes with masculine battle gods who gradually demote the goddesses to inferior positions is then covered.  This is a somewhat simplistic storyline that is well known to many of us, but from the outsider’s perspective, it helps explain the coming of monotheism and the transformation of the powerful woman into the hideous baby-eating witch. Conjectures about the origins of many of the stereotypes of the witch, from flying on broomsticks to midnight orgies with Satan, are discussed during this section.  Again, the strict historian may have bones to pick with some of the material, but the nature of the discussion makes the topic approachable to the mainstream viewer.

This section naturally leads into the inquisition and the Burning Times, focusing, of course, on the infamous Malleus Maleficarum.  It links the Bubonic Plague with the epidemic of seeking, torturing, and murdering “witches,” explaining that the people of the time had only supernatural explanations for the death that surrounded them in its ever-tightening grip.  The particular role of the Malleus, according to A&E, was to single out women as the source of all of these supernatural attacks, as Kramer and Sprenger definitely seemed to have had a severely twisted hatred of all things feminine.

While a large amount of time is spent on the Burning Times and the Salem trials, the estimates of the number of victims is conservative.  The range tops out at 600,000.  The documentary moves on to explain that the mechanistic view of science put a stop to the inquisition.

To me, it’s the explanation of the modern revival that brings up the most questions.  Margaret Murray is prominently featured, and the narrative jumps directly from the academic discrediting of her work to the “thousands of people” who practice Wicca despite Murray’s flaws.  The tone is not cynical.  Wiccans are equated more with ancient followers of nature’s cycles than with Murray’s universal goddess witch cult, but there are nuances of steps between the two that are not given due consideration.

Prominent figures in the development of Wicca are not even mentioned.  Gerald Gardner’s name is never spoken.  This is extremely odd given one of the documentary’s other flaws: Wicca is the only modern expression of Witchcraft that is mentioned.  If today’s Witchcraft is exclusively Wicca, as A&E would have viewers believe, then shouldn’t Wicca’s creator, his companions, and his influences be at least mentioned?  How can you discuss the 20th century revival of the Craft without paying at least a little attention to Gardner, Crowley, Valiente, or Sanders?  Janet Farrar and other modern practitioners are interviewed, which redeems the storyline a little bit, but it is in this section which presents the most incomplete picture of the development of Witchcraft.  The documentary and its mainstream viewers would have benefited from a little less detail on the tortures of the Burning Times and a little more on how Wicca and Witchcraft came to be a part of the modern religious landscape.

Still, given its limitations, Ancient Mysteries: Witches is an even-handed introduction to a topic that is usually met with cynicism, disbelief, and mockery.  It has to walk a very thin line, and for the most part it succeeds.  A new Pagan, seeking some basic information, could get a good foundation out of this brief narrative.  It also has a lot to offer to the parent or friend of someone who has recently come out of the broom closet.  Since the central story is the vilification of Witches over the century and a positive spin on modern practice, this little discussion could put to ease a lot of the common fears held by the loved ones seeking to understand what Paganism and Witchcraft are all about. Witches are explained to the casual viewer, not mocked or sensationalized, and perhaps that single fact makes this documentary a valuable part of the modern discourse on Witchcraft.

Aug 052010
 

The Secret of KellsDirected by: Tomm Moore and Nora Twomey

Written by: Tomm Moore & Fabrice Ziolkowski

North American Release Date: Oct 2010

Website: www.thesecretofkells.com

This Oscar-nominated multiple award-winning animated film is set in a remote medieval monastery in Ireland. The story is a fictional account of the creation of The Book of Kells – the book that will turn darkness into light. The main character is a small orphan boy named Brendan who is being trained to take the place of his uncle the Abbot when he grows up. Life is normal until a scribe shows up with a legendary book and Brendan’s fascination with it is at odds with his uncle’s wishes for him. Brendan is forbidden to enter the forest outside the monastery wall his architect uncle is building to keep out the barbarian invaders who follow closely on the heals of the scribe. But the old scribe asks Brendan to go into the forest and collect some oak galls for him to use for an ink for the book and Brendan feels it is his duty to bring them back to his new friend.

This is where the Pagan influences enter the scene. The forest is lushly animated with trees, flowers, and wildlife, but it is Aisling who steals the show. Aisling is guardian of the forest. She is the spirit of a long dead little girl who can shapeshift and has supernatural powers. The two most notable scenes in the whole movie for Pagan viewers are Aisling’s use of a magical song to change the scribe’s cats into a spirit animal so it can get into a room she cannot in the video shown below:

The second scene that will give you chills is Brendan’s visit to the mound of the ancient Pagan god Crom Cruach which mimics a dangerous shamanic initiation in a cave. By leaving the safety of the monastery and venturing into the forest, Brendan meets spirits, ancient Pagan gods, standing stones, and the beauty and wonder of primal nature. In many ways this gorgeous film reminded me of Brian Bate’s Way of Wyrd with Brendan’s easy reconciling of Christian and Pagan spiritualities. Although The Secret of Kells is an animated film, it is not a children’s movie. Much of the film is frightening – both the storyline and the imagery – so I would recommend it only to preteens and older. Adult Druids, Pagans, Witches and Celtic reconstructionists will adore this film and easily understand how it won so many awards and was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Animated Feature Film of the Year. I highly recommend The Secret of Kells. It is truly a gem of a film. If you’re not tempted yet, I highly recommend watching the trailer:

Aug 032010
 

I was recently thinking about topics for the Juggler and I decided to rewatch an old episode of the X Files that I had remembered from the original air date.

Sanginarium originally aired in 1996, part of the 4th season of the show, which has often been regarded as their best season.  This episode is really overshadowed by the intensely disturbing and controversial episode “Home.”  However, at the time it was aired Sanguinarium was reviewed as being horrifying and overwhelmingly gory.  I remember watching it – I was in college at the time and my room mate and I considered the X Files “can’t miss” television, back before DVRs were invented much less commonplace.  We found ourselves huddled under blankets transfixed and sickened by the images on the screen.  I have an overactive imagination anyway and am prone to nightmares so needless to say, I didn’t sleep well for a few days.  (Notice the theme of “over-” here)
 
These are the memories I had in mind when we sat down with friends to rewatch it just a few weeks ago. 
 
This one off episode, not part of the mythology, begins with the brutal murder of a man scheduled for a scalp reduction.  Instead, he finds himself on the receiving end of a liposuction that is taken way too far.  I don’t even think I have the words to describe my feelings about this scene the first time I watched it.  The show continues as Mulder and Scully are brought in to investigate the murder and the unusual circumstances around it.  They begin to suspect witchcraft by tying together bits of rather flimsy evidence and trace it back to a nurse who appears to be a practicing witch.  However, before they are able to suspect her, she is murdered in another witchcraft-like incident.  The intrepid investigators don’t give up their theories, but rather determine they have been barking up the wrong broomstick. 
 
My intention upon rewatching this episode was to discuss the differences in the media’s treatment of witches between 1996 and today. I had planned to watch the recent witch-centric episode of Bones to do a compare and contrast.  For instance, I understand the Fox Television had received a number of letters after Sanginarium aired from Wiccans or other Pagans to let them know they were upset by how witchcraft had been portrayed.  To my knowledge, and limited googling, I don’t believe there was any similar outcry to the Bones storyline involving Wiccans. 
 
But when we rewatched Sanguinarium I learned something very different than I had expected.  Made nearly 15 years ago, that episode was considered along with its season-mate Home, to be incredibly cutting edge.  Reviewers everywhere indicated that it was one of the scariest and goriest hours on television to date.  And my memory of that liposuction scene affected me quite a bit after the initial viewing.  Sitting down to watch it again, 15 years later, I realized just how not stimulating it was.  There was nothing scary about the episode – except maybe some of the dialogue or really bad investigative conclusions that were drawn by the FBI team.  What happened in the last 15 years?  Did I mature or did I become desensitized to this type of imagery on television?  Are television shows continuing to push the envelope so far that it takes a lot more than a graphic murder-by-liposuction to get someone to jump out of their seat? 
 
I think of the television shows that I like now.  With the advent of premium cable channels making a lot of quality programming, the market is changing dramatically.  True Blood frequently features intense sexual situations punctuated with brutal murders by vampires spewing blood and guts and gore everywhere on set.  I’ve recently become acquainted with Deadwood, which is most notable for its language with the F word said 43 times in just the first hour of the show with the very intention to shock the audience. Even network television has raised the bar when it comes to what is and what isn’t expected on television. 
 
What started as a simple exploration into a 1996 X Files episode with themes of Witchcraft quickly morphed into a deeply internal dialogue about the evolution of graphic images on television. I realized that Paganism in Popular Culture really transcends both Paganism and Popular Culture.  Where are we as a society if we are craving such visual stimulation that a little suspense doesn’t cut it for us anymore.  I quickly forgot that I even cared that Sanguinarium had a witchcraft storyline at all and kind of begin to worry about myself as a human being.  I pondered the greater significance of violence in popular culture in my very first post here.  I haven’t come to any conclusions yet.  And I am not ready to stop enjoying television entertainment just because of some violence or gore.  It is just something to think about, really.

May 312010
 

Seer's Reading List

This reading list is for those with the predisposed ability of seeing ghosts, inhuman spirits, doubles, and visions of the present and future.  Some believe the ability can be transferred by someone who is a seer to someone who is not, but most seers say they would never wish it upon anyone as most of the sights and visions they receive are of misfortune and death with much fewer visions of love, marriage, and birth. As one seer told the father of John MacInnes “he would not advise him nor any man to learn it; for had he once learned, he would never be a minute of his life alone but would see innumerable men and women night and day about him…” (Davidson, p.15)

Cunning Folk and Familiar Spirits: Shamanistic Visionary Traditions in Early Modern British Witchcraft and Magic

by Emma Wilby

I’ve recommended this title often to people for various topics, and here it is again as font of information on the subject.  The material mostly pertains to Scotland and England covering Cunning Folk, mystics, and saints who were all visionaries. Chapters to pay special attention to if you are a seer or mystic yourself include: chapter 9 – Spirit Worlds and High Gods, chapter 10 – Phantasticks and Phantasms, chapter 11 – Psychosis or Spirituality, and chapter 13 – The Unrecognized Mystics. Witches with the sight or clairaudience may also find chapters 3-7 in Part I of the book very useful especially with regards to seeing and hearing familiar spirits – those inhuman and those of the dead.

The Secret Commonwealth: An Essay on the Nature and Actions of the Subterranean (and for the Most Part) Invisible People, Heretofore Going Under the Name of Elves, Fauns, and Fairies

by Robert Kirk

The Secret Commonwealth by Robert KirkRobert Kirk was a minister in Scotland in the 17th century who is most well known for being the first to translate the Bible into Gaelic. What most of his parishioners didn’t know was that in his spare time his hobby was interviewing Scottish Seers and writing a manuscript on their abilities and beliefs. That manuscript was The Secret Commonwealth which was written around 1691. It was not published until well after his death as the subject material was not popular during the time of the inquisition and witch trials. However, with the Romanticism movement interest in mysticism, Pagan gods, and spirits resurfaced and The Secret Commonwealth was well received. Overall it is a difficult read due to the archaic language and Kirk’s extreme misogynism, but it’s well worth the deciphering. It is my own belief that Kirk himself had the second-sight as his obsession with the subject and his uncanny and definitive descriptions of spirits are not those of one simply transcribing what others have said. He does not state this in the manuscript however, but this could be because during his time the second-sight was frowned upon by most clergyman and he could’ve gotten himself in trouble with the Church by admitting he had it or simply for just supporting it.

His conclusions in this work should sound familiar for those who have read The Fairy-Faith in Celtic Countries – which contains only the lingering beliefs while in Kirk’s time they were still in full force. Kirk concludes that fairies are spirits of the dead and Faerieland is the underworld. He also believes their are different kinds – some are nature spirits and not human – and he also covers brownies and other wights. He describes the spirits of the dead as beings made of air – condensed like raindrops into a form like a cloud and that there is nothing evil or unnatural about this nor about communing with land spirits and the dead and he even gives selected Biblical verses which support this. He also writes of circumstances where seers have immigrated to the New World and lost their abilities. He believes this is because the ancestral spirits are tied to the land where someone is born and it is they who give an individual power, visions, and warnings – and when one is removed from their influence one loses any of their abilities because the seer is alien to the ancestral spirits of the new land. North America being so newly discovered when Kirk wrote his work, there is nothing in it of the abilities of the children of the immigrants born in the New World.

If you want to learn about the nature of the spirits of the dead and genius loci, how the “two-sights” or second sight works, and how to gain it – I would recommend checking out this classic work. It’s available online in full in two places – Google Books and Sacred Texts – but the latter version is still in the original phrasing and spelling of the time and can be very difficult to read.

Continue reading »